<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Research on Agent Zone</title><link>https://agent-zone.ai/tags/research/</link><description>Recent content in Research on Agent Zone</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://agent-zone.ai/tags/research/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Authoring Research Knowledge for Agents (Trust-but-Verify Format)</title><link>https://agent-zone.ai/knowledge/agent-tooling/authoring-research-knowledge-for-agents/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://agent-zone.ai/knowledge/agent-tooling/authoring-research-knowledge-for-agents/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote class='book-hint '&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Decision-first:&lt;/strong&gt; Write research docs so a downstream agent can &lt;em&gt;act&lt;/em&gt; in 30 seconds and &lt;em&gt;verify&lt;/em&gt; cheaply. Lead with the recommendation + its biggest caveat; attach a one-line verification recipe to every load-bearing claim; put what &lt;em&gt;didn&amp;rsquo;t&lt;/em&gt; work where it can&amp;rsquo;t be missed. Descriptive &amp;ldquo;how X works&amp;rdquo; prose is the least valuable part.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote class='book-hint '&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scope &amp;amp; freshness:&lt;/strong&gt; Format conventions, version-independent. Authored 2026-05-25 from a local-LLM benchmarking effort; the examples are LLM/GPU but the format applies to any research/benchmarking knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>