Choosing a Kubernetes Backup Strategy#

Kubernetes clusters contain two fundamentally different types of state: cluster state (the Kubernetes objects themselves – Deployments, Services, ConfigMaps, Secrets, CRDs) and application data (the contents of Persistent Volumes). A complete backup strategy must address both. Most backup failures happen because teams back up one but not the other, or because they never test the restore process.

What Needs Backing Up#

Before choosing tools, inventory what your cluster contains:

Choosing an Infrastructure as Code Tool#

Infrastructure as Code tools differ in language, state management, provider ecosystem, and operational model. The choice affects how your team writes, reviews, tests, and maintains infrastructure definitions for years. Switching IaC tools mid-project is possible but expensive – it typically means rewriting all definitions and carefully importing existing resources into the new tool’s state.

Decision Criteria#

Before comparing tools, establish what matters to your organization:

Choosing Kubernetes Storage#

Storage decisions in Kubernetes are harder to change than almost any other architectural choice. Migrating data between storage backends in production involves downtime, risk, and careful planning. Understand the tradeoffs before provisioning your first PersistentVolumeClaim.

The decision comes down to five criteria: performance (IOPS and latency), durability (can you survive node failure), portability (can you move the workload), cost, and access mode (single pod or shared).

Storage Categories#

Block Storage (ReadWriteOnce)#

Block storage provides a raw disk attached to a single node. Only one pod on that node can mount it at a time (ReadWriteOnce). This is the most common storage type for databases, caches, and any workload that needs fast, consistent disk I/O.

Cilium Deep Dive#

Cilium replaces the traditional Kubernetes networking stack with eBPF programs that run directly in the Linux kernel. Instead of kube-proxy translating Service definitions into iptables rules and a traditional CNI plugin managing pod networking through bridge interfaces and routing tables, Cilium attaches eBPF programs to kernel hooks that process packets at wire speed. The result is a networking layer that is faster at scale, capable of Layer 7 policy enforcement, and provides built-in observability without application instrumentation.

Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs)#

CRDs extend the Kubernetes API with your own resource types. Once you create a CRD, you can kubectl get, kubectl apply, and kubectl delete instances of your custom type just like built-in resources. The custom resources are stored in etcd alongside native Kubernetes objects, benefit from the same RBAC, and participate in the same API machinery.

When to Use CRDs#

CRDs make sense when you need to represent application-specific concepts inside Kubernetes:

DaemonSets#

A DaemonSet ensures that a copy of a pod runs on every node in the cluster – or on a selected subset of nodes. When a new node joins the cluster, the DaemonSet controller automatically schedules a pod on it. When a node is removed, the pod is garbage collected.

This is the right abstraction for infrastructure that needs to run everywhere: log collectors, monitoring agents, network plugins, storage drivers, and security tooling.

Database Connection Pooling: PgBouncer, ProxySQL, and Application-Level Patterns#

Database connections are expensive resources. PostgreSQL forks a new OS process for every connection. MySQL creates a thread. Both allocate memory for session state, query buffers, and sort areas. When your application scales horizontally in Kubernetes – 10 pods, then 20, then 50 – the connection count multiplies, and most databases buckle long before your application pods do.

Connection pooling solves this by maintaining a smaller set of persistent connections to the database and sharing them across many application clients. Understanding pooling options, deployment patterns, and sizing is essential for any production database workload on Kubernetes.

How DNS Resolution Works#

When a client requests api.example.com, the resolution follows a chain of queries. The client asks its configured recursive resolver (often the ISP’s, or a public one like 8.8.8.8). The recursive resolver does the heavy lifting: it asks a root name server for .com, the .com TLD server for example.com, and the authoritative name server for example.com returns the answer for api.example.com. Each level caches the result according to the record’s TTL, so subsequent requests short-circuit the chain.

EKS vs AKS vs GKE: Choosing a Managed Kubernetes Provider#

All three major managed Kubernetes services run certified, conformant Kubernetes. The differences lie in networking models, identity integration, node management, upgrade experience, cost, and ecosystem strengths. Your choice should be driven by where the rest of your infrastructure lives, your team’s existing expertise, and specific feature requirements.

Feature Comparison#

Control Plane#

GKE has the most polished upgrade experience. Release channels (Rapid, Regular, Stable) provide automatic upgrades with configurable maintenance windows. Surge upgrades handle node pools with minimal disruption. Google invented Kubernetes, and GKE reflects that pedigree in control plane operations.

Emulating Production Namespace Organization in Minikube#

Setting up namespaces locally the same way you organize them in production builds muscle memory for real operations. When your local cluster mirrors production namespace structure, you catch RBAC misconfigurations, resource limit issues, and network policy gaps before they reach staging. It also means your Helm values files, Kustomize overlays, and deployment scripts work identically across environments.

Why Bother Locally#

The default minikube experience is everything deployed into default. This teaches bad habits. Developers forget -n flags, RBAC issues are never caught, resource contention is never simulated, and the first time anyone encounters namespace isolation is in production – where the consequences are real.