Debugging Workflow#

Start broad, narrow down. Most problems fall into five categories: service not running, resource exhaustion, full disk, network failure, or kernel issue. Work through them in order: service, resources, network, kernel logs.

Services: systemctl and journalctl#

When a service is misbehaving, start with its status:

systemctl status nginx

This shows whether the service is active, its PID, its last few log lines, and how long it has been running. If the service keeps restarting, the uptime will be suspiciously short.

Multi-Cloud Networking Patterns#

Multi-cloud networking connects workloads across two or more cloud providers into a coherent network. The motivations vary – vendor redundancy, best-of-breed service selection, regulatory requirements – but the challenges are the same: private connectivity between isolated networks, consistent service discovery, and traffic routing that handles failures.

VPN Tunnels Between Clouds#

IPsec VPN tunnels are the simplest way to connect two cloud networks. Each provider offers managed VPN gateways that terminate IPsec tunnels, encrypting traffic between VPCs without exposing it to the public internet.

Configuration File Structure#

Nginx configuration follows a hierarchical block structure. The main configuration file is typically /etc/nginx/nginx.conf, which includes files from /etc/nginx/conf.d/ or /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/.

# /etc/nginx/nginx.conf
user nginx;
worker_processes auto;           # Match CPU core count
error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log warn;
pid /run/nginx.pid;

events {
    worker_connections 1024;     # Per worker process
    multi_accept on;             # Accept multiple connections at once
}

http {
    include       /etc/nginx/mime.types;
    default_type  application/octet-stream;

    log_format main '$remote_addr - $remote_user [$time_local] '
                    '"$request" $status $body_bytes_sent '
                    '"$http_referer" "$http_user_agent" '
                    '$request_time $upstream_response_time';

    access_log /var/log/nginx/access.log main;

    sendfile on;
    tcp_nopush on;
    tcp_nodelay on;
    keepalive_timeout 65;
    types_hash_max_size 2048;
    client_max_body_size 16m;

    include /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf;
}

The worker_processes auto directive sets one worker per CPU core. Each worker handles worker_connections simultaneous connections, so total capacity is worker_processes * worker_connections. For most production deployments, auto with 1024 connections per worker is sufficient.

Prometheus Architecture#

Prometheus pulls metrics from targets at regular intervals (scraping). Each target exposes an HTTP endpoint (typically /metrics) that returns metrics in a text format. Prometheus stores the scraped data in a local time-series database and evaluates alerting rules against it. Grafana connects to Prometheus as a data source and renders dashboards.

Scrape Configuration#

The core of Prometheus configuration is the scrape config. Each scrape_config block defines a set of targets and how to scrape them.

Refactoring Terraform#

Terraform configurations grow organically. A project starts with 10 resources in one directory. Six months later it has 80 resources, 3 levels of modules, and a state file that takes 2 minutes to plan. Changes feel risky because everything is interconnected. New team members (or agents) cannot understand the structure without reading every file.

Refactoring addresses this — but Terraform refactoring is harder than code refactoring because the state file maps resource addresses to real infrastructure. Rename a resource and Terraform thinks you want to destroy the old one and create a new one. Move a resource into a module and Terraform plans to recreate it. Every structural change requires corresponding state manipulation.

The Core Pattern#

The standard CI/CD pattern for Terraform: run terraform plan on every pull request and post the output as a PR comment. Run terraform apply only when the PR merges to main. This gives reviewers visibility into what will change before approving.

GitHub Actions Workflow#

name: Terraform
on:
  pull_request:
    paths: ["infra/**"]
  push:
    branches: [main]
    paths: ["infra/**"]

permissions:
  id-token: write    # OIDC
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write  # PR comments

jobs:
  terraform:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    defaults:
      run:
        working-directory: infra
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4
        with:
          role-to-assume: arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/terraform-ci
          aws-region: us-east-1

      - uses: hashicorp/setup-terraform@v3
        with:
          terraform_version: 1.7.0
          terraform_wrapper: true  # captures stdout for PR comments

      - name: Terraform Init
        run: terraform init -input=false

      - name: Terraform Format Check
        run: terraform fmt -check -recursive

      - name: Terraform Validate
        run: terraform validate

      - name: Terraform Plan
        id: plan
        run: terraform plan -input=false -no-color -out=tfplan
        continue-on-error: true

      - name: Post Plan to PR
        if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
        uses: actions/github-script@v7
        with:
          script: |
            const plan = `${{ steps.plan.outputs.stdout }}`;
            const truncated = plan.length > 60000
              ? plan.substring(0, 60000) + "\n\n... truncated ..."
              : plan;
            await github.rest.issues.createComment({
              owner: context.repo.owner,
              repo: context.repo.repo,
              issue_number: context.issue.number,
              body: `#### Terraform Plan\n\`\`\`\n${truncated}\n\`\`\``
            });

      - name: Plan Status
        if: steps.plan.outcome == 'failure'
        run: exit 1

      - name: Terraform Apply
        if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' && github.event_name == 'push'
        run: terraform apply -input=false tfplan

The plan step uses continue-on-error: true so the PR comment step still runs. A separate step checks the actual plan outcome. Apply only runs on pushes to main.

Setting Up Multi-Environment Infrastructure: Dev, Staging, and Production#

Running a single environment is straightforward. Running three that drift apart silently is where teams lose weeks debugging “it works in dev.” This operational sequence walks through setting up dev, staging, and production environments that stay consistent where it matters and diverge only where intended.

Phase 1 – Environment Strategy#

Step 1: Define Environments#

Each environment serves a distinct purpose:

• Dev: Rapid iteration. Developers deploy frequently, break things, and recover quickly. Data is disposable. Resources are minimal.
• Staging: Production mirror. Same Kubernetes version, same network policies, same resource quotas. External services point to staging endpoints. Used for integration testing and pre-release validation.
• Production: Real users, real data. Changes go through approval gates. Monitoring is comprehensive and alerting reaches on-call engineers.

Step 2: Isolation Model#

Decision point: Separate clusters per environment versus namespaces in a shared cluster.

Terraform Cloud Architecture Patterns#

The three-tier architecture — networking, managed Kubernetes, managed database — is the most common pattern for production deployments on any major cloud. The concepts are identical across AWS, Azure, and GCP. The Terraform code is not. Resource names differ, required arguments differ, default behaviors differ, and the gotchas that catch agents and humans are cloud-specific.

This article shows the real Terraform for each layer on each cloud, side by side, so agents can write correct infrastructure code for whichever cloud the user deploys to.

Terraform Code Quality#

Writing Terraform that works is easy. Writing Terraform that is safe, maintainable, and comprehensible to the next person (or agent) is harder. Most quality problems are not bugs — they are patterns that work today but create pain tomorrow: hardcoded IDs that break in a new account, missing lifecycle rules that cause accidental data loss, modules that are too big to understand or too small to justify their existence.

Providers, Resources, and Data Sources#

Terraform has three core object types. Providers are plugins that talk to APIs (AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, GitHub). Resources are the things you create and manage. Data sources read existing objects without managing them.

# providers.tf
terraform {
  required_providers {
    aws = {
      source  = "hashicorp/aws"
      version = "~> 5.0"
    }
  }
  required_version = ">= 1.5.0"
}

provider "aws" {
  region = var.region
}

# A resource Terraform creates and manages
resource "aws_vpc" "main" {
  cidr_block = "10.0.0.0/16"
  tags = { Name = "main-vpc" }
}

# A data source that reads an existing AMI
data "aws_ami" "ubuntu" {
  most_recent = true
  owners      = ["099720109477"]
  filter {
    name   = "name"
    values = ["ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-jammy-22.04-amd64-server-*"]
  }
}

resource "aws_instance" "web" {
  ami           = data.aws_ami.ubuntu.id
  instance_type = var.instance_type
  subnet_id     = aws_vpc.main.id
}

Resources create, update, and delete. Data sources only read. If you need information about something Terraform does not manage, use a data source.