Choosing a Deployment Platform for APIs and MVPs#

Picking a deployment platform early in a project matters more than most teams realize. The platform determines your cost floor, your scaling ceiling, your deployment workflow, and how much operational overhead you carry. Switching later is possible but never free – you are always migrating data, rewriting config, and updating DNS.

This guide compares four platforms that cover the most common deployment scenarios: Cloudflare (Workers + D1 + Pages), AWS (Lambda + API Gateway + RDS + S3), Vercel (Pro + serverless functions), and Fly.io (Apps + Postgres). Each has a genuine sweet spot. None is best for everything.

Choosing a Local Model#

The most expensive mistake in local LLM adoption is running a 70B model for a task that a 3B model handles at 20x the speed for equivalent quality. The second most expensive mistake is running a 3B model on a task that requires 32B-level reasoning and getting garbage output.

Matching model size to task complexity is the core skill. This guide provides a framework grounded in empirical benchmarks, not marketing claims.

Choosing a Log Aggregation Stack#

Logs are the most fundamental observability signal. Every application produces them, every incident investigation starts with them, and every compliance framework requires retaining them. The challenge is not collecting logs – it is storing, indexing, querying, and retaining them at scale without spending a fortune.

The choice of log aggregation stack determines your query speed, operational burden, storage costs, and how effectively you can correlate logs with metrics and traces during incident response.

Choosing a Monitoring Stack#

Monitoring is not optional. Without metrics, you are guessing. The question is not whether to monitor but which stack to use. The right choice depends on your cost tolerance, operational capacity, retention requirements, and how much you value control versus convenience.

Decision Criteria#

Before comparing tools, clarify what matters to your organization:

• Cost model: Are you optimizing for infrastructure spend or engineering time? Self-managed tools cost less in licensing but more in operational hours. SaaS tools cost more in subscription fees but less in engineering effort.
• Operational burden: Who manages the monitoring system? Do you have an infrastructure team, or are developers responsible for everything?
• Data retention: Do you need metrics for 15 days, 90 days, or years? Long retention changes the equation significantly.
• Query capability: Does your team know PromQL? Do they need ad-hoc analysis or mostly pre-built dashboards?
• Alerting requirements: Simple threshold alerts, or complex multi-signal alerts with routing and escalation?
• Team expertise: An organization fluent in Prometheus wastes that investment by switching to Datadog. An organization with no Prometheus experience faces a learning curve.

Options at a Glance#

Prometheus + Grafana (Self-Managed)#

Prometheus is the de facto standard for Kubernetes metrics. It uses a pull-based model, scraping metrics from endpoints at configurable intervals, and stores time series data on local disk. Grafana provides visualization. Alertmanager handles alert routing.

Cloud Vendor Product Matrix#

Choosing between cloud vendors requires mapping equivalent services across providers. AWS has 200+ services. Azure has 200+. GCP has 100+. Cloudflare has 20+ but they are tightly integrated and edge-native. This article maps the services that matter for most applications – compute, serverless, databases, storage, networking, and observability – across all four vendors with pricing, availability, and portability for each.

How to Use This Matrix#

Each section maps equivalent products across vendors, then provides:

Kubernetes Cost Audit and Reduction#

Kubernetes clusters accumulate cost waste silently. Resource requests padded “just in case” during initial deployment never get revisited. Load balancers created for debugging stay running. PVCs from deleted applications persist. Over six months, a cluster originally running at $5,000/month can drift to $12,000 with no corresponding increase in actual workload.

This operational plan works through cost reduction systematically, starting with visibility (you cannot cut what you cannot see), moving through quick wins, then tackling the larger structural optimizations that require data collection and careful rollout.

Kubernetes FinOps: Decision Framework for Cost Optimization#

FinOps in Kubernetes is the practice of bringing financial accountability to infrastructure spending. The challenge is not a lack of cost-saving techniques – it is knowing which ones to apply first, which combinations work together, and which ones introduce risk that outweighs the savings. This article provides a structured decision framework for selecting and prioritizing Kubernetes cost optimization strategies.

The Five Optimization Levers#

Every Kubernetes cost optimization effort works across five levers. Each has a different risk profile, implementation effort, and savings ceiling.

Multi-Cloud vs Single-Cloud Strategy#

Multi-cloud is one of the most oversold strategies in infrastructure. Vendors, consultants, and conference speakers promote it as the default approach, but the reality is that most organizations are better served by a single cloud provider used well. This framework helps you determine whether multi-cloud is actually worth the cost for your situation.

The Default Answer Is Single-Cloud#

Start with single-cloud unless you have a specific, concrete reason to go multi-cloud. Here is why.

EKS vs AKS vs GKE: Choosing a Managed Kubernetes Provider#

All three major managed Kubernetes services run certified, conformant Kubernetes. The differences lie in networking models, identity integration, node management, upgrade experience, cost, and ecosystem strengths. Your choice should be driven by where the rest of your infrastructure lives, your team’s existing expertise, and specific feature requirements.

Feature Comparison#

Control Plane#

GKE has the most polished upgrade experience. Release channels (Rapid, Regular, Stable) provide automatic upgrades with configurable maintenance windows. Surge upgrades handle node pools with minimal disruption. Google invented Kubernetes, and GKE reflects that pedigree in control plane operations.

Kubernetes Cost Optimization#

Most Kubernetes clusters run at 15-30% actual CPU utilization but are billed for the full provisioned capacity. The gap between what you reserve and what you use is pure waste. This article covers the practical workflow for finding and eliminating that waste.

The Cost Problem: Requests vs Actual Usage#

Kubernetes resource requests are the foundation of cost. When a pod requests 4 CPUs, the scheduler reserves 4 CPUs on a node regardless of whether the pod ever uses more than 0.1 CPU. The node is sized (and billed) based on what is reserved, not what is consumed.