CI/CD Cost Optimization#

CI/CD costs grow quietly. A team of ten pushing five times a day, running a 15-minute pipeline on 4-core runners, burns through 2,500 build minutes per week. On GitHub Actions at $0.008/minute for Linux runners, that is $20/week. Scale to fifty developers with integration tests, matrix builds, and nightly jobs, and you are looking at $500-$2,000/month before anyone notices.

The fix is not running fewer tests or skipping builds. It is eliminating waste: jobs that use more compute than they need, caches that are never restored, full builds triggered by README changes, and runners sitting idle between jobs.

The Cost Optimization Hierarchy#

Cloud cost optimization follows a hierarchy of impact. Work from the top down – fixing the wrong tier of commitment discount matters far less than shutting down resources nobody uses.

1. Eliminate waste – turn off unused resources, delete orphaned storage
2. Right-size – match instance sizes to actual usage
3. Use commitment discounts – reserved instances, savings plans, CUDs
4. Shift to spot/preemptible – for fault-tolerant workloads
5. Optimize storage and network – tiering, transfer patterns, caching
6. Architect for cost – serverless, auto-scaling, multi-region strategy

Eliminating Waste#

The fastest cost reduction comes from finding resources that serve no purpose. Every cloud provider accumulates these: instances left running after a test, snapshots from decommissioned servers, load balancers with no backends, unattached disks.

What Capacity Planning Solves#

Running out of capacity during a traffic spike causes outages. Over-provisioning wastes money continuously. Capacity planning is the process of measuring what you use now, projecting what you will need, and ensuring resources are available before demand arrives. Without it, you are either constantly firefighting resource exhaustion or explaining to finance why your cloud bill doubled.

Capacity planning is not a one-time exercise. It is a recurring process – monthly for fast-growing services, quarterly for stable ones.

Kubernetes Cost Audit and Reduction#

Kubernetes clusters accumulate cost waste silently. Resource requests padded “just in case” during initial deployment never get revisited. Load balancers created for debugging stay running. PVCs from deleted applications persist. Over six months, a cluster originally running at $5,000/month can drift to $12,000 with no corresponding increase in actual workload.

This operational plan works through cost reduction systematically, starting with visibility (you cannot cut what you cannot see), moving through quick wins, then tackling the larger structural optimizations that require data collection and careful rollout.

Kubernetes FinOps: Decision Framework for Cost Optimization#

FinOps in Kubernetes is the practice of bringing financial accountability to infrastructure spending. The challenge is not a lack of cost-saving techniques – it is knowing which ones to apply first, which combinations work together, and which ones introduce risk that outweighs the savings. This article provides a structured decision framework for selecting and prioritizing Kubernetes cost optimization strategies.

The Five Optimization Levers#

Every Kubernetes cost optimization effort works across five levers. Each has a different risk profile, implementation effort, and savings ceiling.

Multi-Cloud vs Single-Cloud Strategy#

Multi-cloud is one of the most oversold strategies in infrastructure. Vendors, consultants, and conference speakers promote it as the default approach, but the reality is that most organizations are better served by a single cloud provider used well. This framework helps you determine whether multi-cloud is actually worth the cost for your situation.

The Default Answer Is Single-Cloud#

Start with single-cloud unless you have a specific, concrete reason to go multi-cloud. Here is why.

Kubernetes Cost Optimization#

Most Kubernetes clusters run at 15-30% actual CPU utilization but are billed for the full provisioned capacity. The gap between what you reserve and what you use is pure waste. This article covers the practical workflow for finding and eliminating that waste.

The Cost Problem: Requests vs Actual Usage#

Kubernetes resource requests are the foundation of cost. When a pod requests 4 CPUs, the scheduler reserves 4 CPUs on a node regardless of whether the pod ever uses more than 0.1 CPU. The node is sized (and billed) based on what is reserved, not what is consumed.

Spot Instances and Preemptible Nodes#

Spot instances are unused cloud capacity sold at a steep discount – typically 60-90% off on-demand pricing. The trade-off: the cloud provider can reclaim them with minimal notice. AWS gives a 2-minute warning, GCP gives 30 seconds, and Azure varies. Running Kubernetes workloads on spot instances is one of the most effective cost reduction strategies available, but it requires architecture that tolerates sudden node loss.