Prometheus Architecture Deep Dive

Pull-Based Scraping Model#

Prometheus pulls metrics from targets rather than having targets push metrics to it. Every scrape interval (default 15s in the global config), Prometheus sends an HTTP GET to each target’s metrics endpoint. The target responds with all its current metric values in Prometheus exposition format.

This pull model has concrete advantages. Prometheus controls the scrape rate, so a misbehaving target cannot flood the system. You can scrape a target from your laptop with curl http://target:8080/metrics to see exactly what Prometheus sees. Targets that go down are immediately detectable because the scrape fails.

Monitoring Prometheus Itself: Capacity Planning, Self-Monitoring, and Scaling

Why Monitor Your Monitoring#

If Prometheus runs out of memory and crashes, you lose all alerting. If its disk fills up, it stops ingesting and you have a blind spot that may last hours before anyone notices. If scrapes start timing out, metrics go stale and alerts based on rate() produce no data (which means they silently stop firing rather than triggering). Prometheus must be the most reliably monitored component in your stack.

Multi-Cluster Kubernetes: Architecture, Networking, and Management Patterns

Multi-Cluster Kubernetes#

A single Kubernetes cluster is a single blast radius. A bad deployment, a control plane failure, a misconfigured admission webhook – any of these can take down everything. Multi-cluster is not about complexity for its own sake. It is about isolation, resilience, and operating workloads that span regions, regulations, or teams.

Why Multi-Cluster#

Blast radius isolation. A cluster-wide failure (etcd corruption, bad admission webhook, API server overload) only affects one cluster. Critical workloads in another cluster are untouched.