EKS vs AKS vs GKE: Choosing a Managed Kubernetes Provider#

All three major managed Kubernetes services run certified, conformant Kubernetes. The differences lie in networking models, identity integration, node management, upgrade experience, cost, and ecosystem strengths. Your choice should be driven by where the rest of your infrastructure lives, your team’s existing expertise, and specific feature requirements.

Feature Comparison#

Control Plane#

GKE has the most polished upgrade experience. Release channels (Rapid, Regular, Stable) provide automatic upgrades with configurable maintenance windows. Surge upgrades handle node pools with minimal disruption. Google invented Kubernetes, and GKE reflects that pedigree in control plane operations.

Managed Kubernetes vs Self-Managed#

The fundamental tradeoff is straightforward: managed Kubernetes trades control for reduced operational burden, while self-managed Kubernetes gives you full control at the cost of owning everything – etcd, certificates, upgrades, high availability, and recovery.

This decision has cascading effects on team structure, hiring, on-call burden, and long-term maintenance cost. Choose deliberately.

Managed Kubernetes (EKS, AKS, GKE)#

The cloud provider runs the control plane: API server, etcd, controller manager, scheduler. They handle patching, scaling, and high availability for these components. You manage worker nodes and workloads.