Service Decomposition Anti-Patterns#

Splitting a monolith into microservices is a common architectural goal. But bad decomposition creates systems that are harder to operate than the monolith they replaced. These anti-patterns are disturbingly common and often unrecognized until the team is deep in operational pain.

The Distributed Monolith#

The distributed monolith looks like microservices from the outside – separate repositories, separate deployments, separate CI pipelines – but behaves like a monolith at runtime. Services cannot be deployed independently because they are tightly coupled.

Choosing a Deployment Platform for APIs and MVPs#

Picking a deployment platform early in a project matters more than most teams realize. The platform determines your cost floor, your scaling ceiling, your deployment workflow, and how much operational overhead you carry. Switching later is possible but never free – you are always migrating data, rewriting config, and updating DNS.

This guide compares four platforms that cover the most common deployment scenarios: Cloudflare (Workers + D1 + Pages), AWS (Lambda + API Gateway + RDS + S3), Vercel (Pro + serverless functions), and Fly.io (Apps + Postgres). Each has a genuine sweet spot. None is best for everything.

Converting kubectl Manifests to Helm Charts#

You have a set of YAML files that you kubectl apply to deploy your application. They work, but deploying to a second environment means copying files and editing values by hand. Helm charts solve this by parameterizing your manifests.

Step 1: Scaffold the Chart#

Create the chart structure with helm create:

helm create my-app

This generates:

my-app/
  Chart.yaml           # Chart metadata (name, version, appVersion)
  values.yaml          # Default configuration values
  charts/              # Subcharts / dependencies
  templates/
    deployment.yaml    # Deployment template
    service.yaml       # Service template
    ingress.yaml       # Ingress template
    hpa.yaml           # HorizontalPodAutoscaler
    serviceaccount.yaml
    _helpers.tpl       # Named template helpers
    NOTES.txt          # Post-install message
    tests/
      test-connection.yaml

Delete the generated templates you do not need. Keep _helpers.tpl – it provides essential naming functions.

Converting kubectl Manifests to Terraform#

You have a working Kubernetes setup built with kubectl apply -f. It works, but there is no state tracking, no dependency graph, and no way to reliably reproduce it. Terraform fixes all three problems.

Step 1: Export Existing Resources#

Start by extracting what you have. For each resource type, export the YAML:

kubectl get deployment,service,configmap,ingress -n my-app -o yaml > exported.yaml

For a single resource with cleaner output:

Kubernetes API Deprecation Guide#

Kubernetes deprecates and removes API versions on a predictable schedule. When an API version is removed, any manifests or Helm charts using the old version will fail to apply on the upgraded cluster. Workloads already running are not affected – they continue to run – but you cannot create, update, or redeploy them until the manifests are updated. This guide walks through the complete workflow for detecting and fixing deprecated APIs before an upgrade.

Minikube to Cloud Migration Guide#

Minikube is excellent for learning and local development. But almost everything that “just works” on minikube requires explicit configuration on a cloud cluster. Here are the 10 things that change.

1. Ingress Controller Becomes a Cloud Load Balancer#

On minikube: You enable the NGINX ingress addon with minikube addons enable ingress. Traffic reaches your services through minikube tunnel or minikube service.

On cloud: The ingress controller must be deployed explicitly, and it provisions a real cloud load balancer. On AWS, the AWS Load Balancer Controller creates ALBs or NLBs from Ingress resources. On GKE, the built-in GCE ingress controller creates Google Cloud Load Balancers. You pay per load balancer.

Refactoring Terraform#

Terraform configurations grow organically. A project starts with 10 resources in one directory. Six months later it has 80 resources, 3 levels of modules, and a state file that takes 2 minutes to plan. Changes feel risky because everything is interconnected. New team members (or agents) cannot understand the structure without reading every file.

Refactoring addresses this — but Terraform refactoring is harder than code refactoring because the state file maps resource addresses to real infrastructure. Rename a resource and Terraform thinks you want to destroy the old one and create a new one. Move a resource into a module and Terraform plans to recreate it. Every structural change requires corresponding state manipulation.

Scenario: Migrating Workloads Between Kubernetes Clusters#

You are helping when someone says: “we need to move workloads from cluster A to cluster B.” The reasons vary – Kubernetes version upgrade, cloud provider migration, region change, architecture consolidation, or moving from self-managed to a managed service. The complexity ranges from trivial (stateless services with GitOps) to significant (stateful workloads with zero-downtime requirements).

The core risk in any cluster migration is data loss for stateful workloads and downtime during the traffic cutover. Every decision in this plan aims to minimize both.