Docker Compose Validation Stacks#

Docker Compose validates multi-service architectures without Kubernetes overhead. It answers the question: do these services actually work together? Containers start, connect, and communicate – or they fail, giving you fast feedback before you push to a cluster.

This article provides complete Compose stacks for four common validation scenarios. Each includes the full docker-compose.yml, health check scripts, and teardown procedures. The pattern for using them is always the same: clone the template, customize for your services, bring it up, validate, capture results, bring it down.

kind Validation Templates#

kind (Kubernetes IN Docker) runs Kubernetes clusters using Docker containers as nodes. It was designed for testing Kubernetes itself, which makes it an excellent tool for validating infrastructure changes. It starts fast, uses fewer resources than minikube, and is disposable by design.

This article provides copy-paste cluster configurations and complete lifecycle scripts for common validation scenarios.

Cluster Configuration Templates#

Basic Single-Node#

The simplest configuration. One container acts as both control plane and worker. Sufficient for validating that deployments, services, ConfigMaps, and Secrets work correctly.

Template Contribution Guide#

Agent Zone validation templates are reusable infrastructure configurations that agents and developers use to validate changes. A Kubernetes devcontainer template, an ephemeral EKS cluster module, a static validation pipeline script – each follows a standard format so that any agent or developer can pick one up, understand its purpose, and use it without reading through implementation details.

This guide defines the standards for contributing templates. It covers directory structure, required files, testing, quality expectations, versioning, and the submission process.

Testing Infrastructure Code#

Infrastructure code has a unique testing challenge: the thing you are testing is expensive to instantiate. You cannot spin up a VPC, an RDS instance, and an EKS cluster for every pull request and tear it down 5 minutes later without significant cost and time. But you also cannot ship untested infrastructure changes to production without risk.

The solution is the same as in software engineering: a testing pyramid. Fast, cheap tests at the bottom catch most errors. Slower, expensive tests at the top catch the rest. The key is knowing what to test at which level.

Validation Path Selection#

Not every infrastructure change needs a full Kubernetes cluster to validate. Some changes can be verified with a linter in under a second. Others genuinely need a multi-node cluster with ingress, persistent volumes, and network policies. The cost of choosing wrong is real in both directions: too little validation lets broken configs reach production, while too much wastes minutes or hours on environments you did not need.

Validation Playbook Format#

A validation playbook is a structured procedure that tells an agent exactly how to validate a specific type of infrastructure change. The key problem it solves: the same validation (for example, “verify this Helm chart works”) requires different commands depending on whether the agent has access to kind, minikube, a cloud cluster, or nothing but a linter. A playbook encodes all path variants in one document so the agent picks the right commands for its environment.