Multi-Region Kubernetes#

Running Kubernetes in a single region is a single point of failure at the infrastructure level. Region outages are rare but real – AWS us-east-1 has gone down multiple times, taking entire companies offline. Multi-region Kubernetes addresses this, but it introduces complexity in networking, state management, and deployment coordination that you must handle deliberately.

Independent Clusters with Shared GitOps#

The simplest multi-region pattern: run completely independent clusters in each region, deploy the same applications to all of them using GitOps, and route traffic with DNS or a global load balancer.

Network Policies: Namespace Isolation and Pod-to-Pod Rules#

By default, every pod in a Kubernetes cluster can talk to every other pod. Network policies let you restrict that. They are namespace-scoped resources that select pods by label and define allowed ingress and egress rules.

Critical Prerequisite: CNI Support#

Network policies are only enforced if your CNI plugin supports them. Calico, Cilium, and Weave all support network policies. Flannel does not. If you are running Flannel, you can create NetworkPolicy resources without errors, but they will have absolutely no effect. This is a silent failure that wastes hours of debugging.

Choosing a Service Mesh#

A service mesh moves networking concerns – mutual TLS, traffic routing, retries, circuit breaking, observability – out of application code and into the infrastructure layer. Every pod gets a proxy that handles these concerns transparently. The control plane configures all proxies across the cluster.

The decision is not just “which mesh” but “do you need one at all.”

Do You Actually Need a Service Mesh?#

Many teams adopt a mesh prematurely. Before evaluating options, identify which specific problems you are trying to solve: