Multi-Cloud Networking Patterns

Multi-Cloud Networking Patterns#

Multi-cloud networking connects workloads across two or more cloud providers into a coherent network. The motivations vary – vendor redundancy, best-of-breed service selection, regulatory requirements – but the challenges are the same: private connectivity between isolated networks, consistent service discovery, and traffic routing that handles failures.

VPN Tunnels Between Clouds#

IPsec VPN tunnels are the simplest way to connect two cloud networks. Each provider offers managed VPN gateways that terminate IPsec tunnels, encrypting traffic between VPCs without exposing it to the public internet.

Prometheus Architecture Deep Dive

Pull-Based Scraping Model#

Prometheus pulls metrics from targets rather than having targets push metrics to it. Every scrape interval (default 15s in the global config), Prometheus sends an HTTP GET to each target’s metrics endpoint. The target responds with all its current metric values in Prometheus exposition format.

This pull model has concrete advantages. Prometheus controls the scrape rate, so a misbehaving target cannot flood the system. You can scrape a target from your laptop with curl http://target:8080/metrics to see exactly what Prometheus sees. Targets that go down are immediately detectable because the scrape fails.

Choosing a Service Mesh: Istio vs Linkerd vs Consul Connect vs No Mesh

Choosing a Service Mesh#

A service mesh moves networking concerns – mutual TLS, traffic routing, retries, circuit breaking, observability – out of application code and into the infrastructure layer. Every pod gets a proxy that handles these concerns transparently. The control plane configures all proxies across the cluster.

The decision is not just “which mesh” but “do you need one at all.”

Do You Actually Need a Service Mesh?#

Many teams adopt a mesh prematurely. Before evaluating options, identify which specific problems you are trying to solve: