Devcontainer Sandbox Templates#

Devcontainers provide disposable, reproducible development environments that run in a container. You define the tools, extensions, and configuration in a .devcontainer/ directory, and any compatible host – GitHub Codespaces, Gitpod, VS Code with Docker, or the devcontainer CLI – builds and launches the environment from that definition.

For infrastructure validation, devcontainers solve a specific problem: giving every developer and every CI run the exact same set of tools at the exact same versions, without requiring them to install anything on their local machine. A Kubernetes devcontainer includes kind, kubectl, helm, and kustomize at pinned versions. A Terraform devcontainer includes terraform, tflint, checkov, and cloud CLIs. The environment is ready to use the moment it starts.

The Fidelity-Speed Tradeoff#

Every local development environment sits on a spectrum between two extremes. On one end: running everything locally with no containers, maximum speed, minimum fidelity to production. On the other end: a full Kubernetes cluster with service mesh, maximum fidelity, minimum speed. Every tool in this space makes a different bet on where the sweet spot is.

The right choice depends on your answers to three questions. How many services does your application depend on? How different is your production environment from a single machine? How long can developers tolerate waiting for changes to take effect?

Validation Path Selection#

Not every infrastructure change needs a full Kubernetes cluster to validate. Some changes can be verified with a linter in under a second. Others genuinely need a multi-node cluster with ingress, persistent volumes, and network policies. The cost of choosing wrong is real in both directions: too little validation lets broken configs reach production, while too much wastes minutes or hours on environments you did not need.