The Core Difference#

Active-passive: one region handles all traffic, a second region stands ready to take over. Failover is an event – something triggers it, traffic shifts, and there is a gap between detection and recovery.

Active-active: both regions handle production traffic simultaneously. There is no failover event for regional traffic – if one region fails, the other is already serving users. The complexity is in keeping data consistent across regions, not in switching traffic.

DNS-Based Global Server Load Balancing#

Global server load balancing (GSLB) directs users to the nearest or healthiest regional deployment. The most common approach is DNS-based: the authoritative DNS server returns different IP addresses depending on the querying client’s location, the health of backend regions, or configured routing policies.

When a user resolves app.example.com, the GSLB-aware DNS server considers the user’s location (inferred from the resolver’s IP or EDNS Client Subnet), the health of each regional endpoint, and the configured routing policy. It returns the IP address of the best region for that user.

DNS Is Not a Load Balancer#

This needs to be said upfront: DNS was designed for name resolution, not traffic management. Using DNS for failover is a pragmatic hack that works well enough for most use cases, but it has fundamental limitations.

DNS responses are cached at multiple levels (recursive resolvers, OS caches, application caches, browser caches). You cannot force a client to re-resolve. You can set a TTL, but clients and resolvers are free to ignore it (and some do). Java applications, for example, cache DNS indefinitely by default in some JVM versions unless you explicitly set networkaddress.cache.ttl.

Cloud Multi-Region Architecture Patterns#

Multi-region is not just running clusters in two places. It is the networking between them, the data replication strategy, the traffic routing, and the cost of keeping it all running. Each cloud provider has different primitives and different pricing models. Here is how to build it on each.

The three pillars: a Kubernetes cluster per region for compute, a global traffic routing layer to direct users to the nearest healthy region, and a multi-region database for state. Get any one wrong and multi-region gives you complexity without resilience.

Remote Backends#

Every team beyond a single developer needs remote state. The three major backends:

S3 + DynamoDB (AWS):

terraform {
  backend "s3" {
    bucket         = "myorg-tfstate"
    key            = "prod/network/terraform.tfstate"
    region         = "us-east-1"
    dynamodb_table = "terraform-locks"
    encrypt        = true
  }
}

Azure Blob Storage:

terraform {
  backend "azurerm" {
    resource_group_name  = "tfstate-rg"
    storage_account_name = "myorgtfstate"
    container_name       = "tfstate"
    key                  = "prod/network/terraform.tfstate"
  }
}

Google Cloud Storage:

terraform {
  backend "gcs" {
    bucket = "myorg-tfstate"
    prefix = "prod/network"
  }
}

All three support locking natively (DynamoDB for S3, blob leases for Azure, object locking for GCS). Always enable encryption at rest and restrict access with IAM.

Agent Runbook Generation#

An agent that says “you should probably add a readiness probe to your deployment” is giving advice. An agent that hands you a tested manifest with the readiness probe configured, verified against a real cluster, with rollback steps if the probe misconfigures – that agent is producing a deliverable. The difference matters.

The core thesis of infrastructure agent work is that the output is always a deliverable – a runbook, playbook, tested manifest, or validated configuration – never a direct action on someone else’s systems. This article covers the complete workflow for generating those deliverables: understanding requirements, planning steps, executing in a sandbox, capturing what worked, and packaging the result.

Agent-Oriented Terraform#

Most Terraform code is written by humans for humans. It favors abstraction, DRY principles, and deep module nesting — patterns that make sense when a human maintains a mental model of the codebase. Agents do not maintain mental models. They read code fresh each time, trace references to resolve dependencies, and reason about the full resource graph in a single context window.

The patterns that make Terraform elegant for humans make it expensive for agents. Deep module nesting multiplies the files an agent must read. Variable threading through three layers of modules hides dependencies behind indirection. Complex for_each over maps of objects creates resources that are invisible until runtime. The agent spends most of its context on navigation, not comprehension.

AKS Setup and Configuration#

Azure Kubernetes Service handles the control plane for you – you pay nothing for it. What you configure is node pools, networking, identity, and add-ons. Getting these right at cluster creation matters because several choices (networking model, managed identity) cannot be changed later without rebuilding the cluster.

Creating a Cluster with az CLI#

The minimal command that produces a production-usable cluster:

az aks create \
  --resource-group myapp-rg \
  --name myapp-aks \
  --location eastus2 \
  --node-count 3 \
  --node-vm-size Standard_D4s_v5 \
  --network-plugin azure \
  --network-plugin-mode overlay \
  --vnet-subnet-id /subscriptions/<sub>/resourceGroups/myapp-rg/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/myapp-vnet/subnets/aks-subnet \
  --enable-managed-identity \
  --enable-aad \
  --aad-admin-group-object-ids <admin-group-id> \
  --generate-ssh-keys \
  --tier standard

Key flags: --network-plugin azure --network-plugin-mode overlay gives you Azure CNI Overlay, which avoids the IP exhaustion problems of classic Azure CNI. --tier standard enables the financially-backed SLA and uptime guarantees (the free tier has no SLA). --enable-aad integrates Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) for authentication.

ArgoCD with Terraform and Crossplane#

Applications need infrastructure – databases, queues, caches, object storage, DNS records, certificates. In a GitOps workflow managed by ArgoCD, there are two approaches to provisioning that infrastructure: Crossplane (Kubernetes-native) and Terraform (external). Each has different strengths and integration patterns with ArgoCD.

Crossplane: Infrastructure as Kubernetes CRDs#

Crossplane extends Kubernetes with CRDs that represent cloud resources. An RDS instance becomes a YAML manifest. A GCS bucket becomes a YAML manifest. ArgoCD manages these manifests exactly like it manages Deployments and Services.

The Manual-to-Automated Progression#

Not every runbook should be automated, and automation does not happen in a single jump. The progression builds confidence at each stage.

Level 0 – Tribal Knowledge: The procedure exists only in someone’s head. Invisible risk.

Level 1 – Documented Runbook: Step-by-step instructions a human follows, including commands, expected outputs, and decision points. Every runbook starts here.

Level 2 – Scripted Runbook: Manual steps encoded in a script that a human triggers and monitors. The script handles tedious parts; the human handles judgment calls.