Artifact Management: Repository Selection, Container Lifecycle, Retention, and Promotion Workflows

Artifact Management#

Every CI/CD pipeline produces artifacts: container images, compiled binaries, library packages, Helm charts. Where these artifacts live, how long they are retained, how they are promoted between environments, and how they are scanned for vulnerabilities are decisions that affect security, cost, and operational reliability. Choosing the wrong artifact repository or neglecting lifecycle management creates accumulating storage costs and security blind spots.

Repository Options#

JFrog Artifactory#

Artifactory is the most comprehensive option. It supports every package type: Docker images, Maven/Gradle JARs, npm packages, PyPI wheels, Helm charts, Go modules, NuGet packages, and generic binaries. It serves as a universal artifact store and a caching proxy for upstream registries.

Building a Kubernetes Deployment Pipeline: From Code Push to Production

Building a Kubernetes Deployment Pipeline: From Code Push to Production#

A deployment pipeline connects a code commit to a running container in your cluster. This operational sequence walks through building one end-to-end, with decision points at each phase and verification steps to confirm the pipeline works before moving on.

Phase 1 – Source Control and CI#

Step 1: Repository Structure#

Every deployable service needs three things alongside its application code: a Dockerfile, deployment manifests, and a CI pipeline definition.

Container Image Scanning: Finding and Managing Vulnerabilities

Container Image Scanning#

Every container image you deploy carries an operating system, libraries, and application dependencies. Each of those components can have known vulnerabilities. Image scanning compares the packages in your image against databases of CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) and tells you what is exploitable.

Scanning is not optional. It is a baseline hygiene practice that belongs in every CI pipeline.

How CVE Databases Work#

Scanners pull vulnerability data from multiple sources: the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), vendor-specific feeds (Red Hat, Debian, Alpine, Ubuntu security trackers), and language-specific advisory databases (GitHub Advisory Database for npm/pip/go). Each CVE has a severity rating based on CVSS scores:

Infrastructure Security Testing Approaches

Choosing the Right Testing Approach#

Infrastructure security testing is not one activity. It is a spectrum from fully automated scanning to manual adversarial testing. Each approach has different costs, coverage, and compliance implications. Choosing wrong wastes budget on low-value scans or leaves critical gaps unexamined.

The core decision is: what are you trying to learn, and what constraints do you operate under?

Decision Matrix#

Question Automated Scanning Kubernetes-Specific Testing Network Scanning Manual Penetration Testing
What does it find? Known CVEs, misconfigurations, missing patches K8s-specific misconfigurations, RBAC issues, pod security gaps Open ports, exposed services, protocol weaknesses Business logic flaws, chained exploits, privilege escalation paths
How often? Continuous or daily Every cluster change, weekly minimum Weekly to monthly Annually or after major architecture changes
Who runs it? Automated pipeline or security team Platform/SRE team Security team or automated Specialized pentest firm or red team
Cost Low (tooling cost only) Low (open-source tools) Low to medium High ($20k-$100k+ per engagement)
False positive rate Medium to high Low Medium Very low
Compliance fit PCI-DSS 11.2, SOC2 CC7.1 CIS Kubernetes Benchmark PCI-DSS 11.2, NIST 800-53 PCI-DSS 11.3, SOC2 CC4.1

When to Use Each Approach#

Use automated scanning when you need continuous visibility into known vulnerabilities across your infrastructure. This is the baseline. Every organization should run automated scans regardless of what other testing they do.

Kubernetes Production Readiness Checklist: Everything to Verify Before Going Live

Kubernetes Production Readiness Checklist#

This checklist is designed for agents to audit a Kubernetes cluster before production workloads run on it. Every item includes the verification command and what a passing result looks like. Work through each category sequentially. A failing item in Cluster Health should be fixed before checking Workload Configuration.


Cluster Health#

These are non-negotiable. If any of these fail, stop and fix them before evaluating anything else.

Securing Docker-Based Validation Templates

Securing Docker-Based Validation Templates#

Validation templates define the environment agents use to test infrastructure changes. If a template runs containers as root, mounts the Docker socket, or skips resource limits, every agent that copies it inherits those risks. This reference covers the security patterns every docker-compose validation template must follow.

1. Non-Root Execution#

Containers run as root by default. A vulnerability in a root-running process gives an attacker full control inside the container and a much larger attack surface for container escapes.

Security Compliance and Benchmarks

Why Benchmarks Matter#

Security benchmarks translate “harden the cluster” into specific, testable checks. Run a scan, get a pass/fail report, fix what failed. CIS publishes the most widely adopted benchmarks for Kubernetes and Docker. NSA/CISA provide additional Kubernetes-specific threat guidance.

CIS Kubernetes Benchmark with kube-bench#

kube-bench runs CIS Kubernetes Benchmark checks against cluster nodes, testing API server flags, etcd configuration, kubelet settings, and control plane security:

# Run on a master node
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/main/job-master.yaml

# Run on worker nodes
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/main/job-node.yaml

# Read results
kubectl logs job/kube-bench

Or run directly on a node:

Security Hardening a Kubernetes Cluster: End-to-End Operational Sequence

Security Hardening a Kubernetes Cluster#

This operational sequence takes a default Kubernetes cluster and locks it down. Phases are ordered by impact and dependency: assessment first, then RBAC, pod security, networking, images, auditing, and finally data protection. Each phase includes the commands, policy YAML, and verification steps.

Do not skip the assessment phase. You need to know what you are fixing before you start fixing it.


Phase 1 – Assessment#

Before changing anything, establish a baseline. This phase produces a prioritized list of findings that drives the order of remediation in later phases.

Security Incident Response for Infrastructure

Incident Response Overview#

Security incidents in infrastructure environments follow a predictable lifecycle. The difference between a contained incident and a catastrophic breach is usually preparation and speed of response. This playbook covers the six phases of incident response with specific commands and procedures for Kubernetes and containerized infrastructure.

The phases are sequential but overlap in practice: you may be containing one aspect of an incident while still detecting the full scope.

Software Bill of Materials and Vulnerability Management

What Is an SBOM#

A Software Bill of Materials is a machine-readable inventory of every component in a software artifact. It lists packages, libraries, versions, licenses, and dependency relationships. An SBOM answers the question: what exactly is inside this container image, binary, or repository?

When a new CVE drops, organizations without SBOMs scramble to determine which systems are affected. Organizations with SBOMs query a database and have the answer in seconds.